If you’re keen on irony, you can celebrate by buying yourself an assualt weapon for “for target shooting, shooting competitions, hunting, collecting, and most importantly, self-defense,” as the NRA puts it. Because they’re legal now. You might also be interested in the awkwardly named National Police Shooting Championships, which sounds like some sort of gangsta-rap fantasy camp. But it isn’t.
[untitled]
Topic: Politics
Josh Marshal has pointed out that a key tactic for John Kerry is convincing voters that he has a plan for Iraq. So far, his arguments have been for internationalizing the conflict. While I think that this is a useful and realistic approach to Iraq, I also think it’s a loser with the electorate: it smacks of passing the buck, and it plays into the Republican attack on Kerry as vaguely un-American and in thrall to foreign powers.
After reading Peter W. Galbraith’s scathing critique of the reconstruction in Iraq in the New York Review of Books, I found that a different approach suggested itself. Kerry should argue that the occupation and reconstruction are a disaster because they’ve been run by Bush’s cronies and political supporters — the same people who gave you Enron, the blackouts in California, and today’s stellar economy. Kerry should offer an alternative: hiring the best people for the job — people with the right experience, regardless of their political affiliations.
This approach is valuable on several fronts. It reinforces one of the more widely held negative views of Republicans in general and the Bush Administration in particular, which is that they are greedy and susceptible to cronyism. It is actually a sensible approach to Iraq. And it’s not hard to boil down to pithy slogans.
“We need the best people supporting our soldiers in Iraq. We need people with experience and integrity. Doers, not donors.”
I don’t think any of that’s political gold exactly — those are just off the top of my head — but it does manage to wrap a plan and a critique into one, and also to avoid the trap of sounding like you’re waiting for France to rescue us.
[harry smith]
The Anthology was comprised entirely of recordings issued between 1927 (the year electronic recording made accurate reproduction possible) and 1932, the period between the realization by the major record companies of distinct regional markets and the Depression’s stifling of folk music sales. Released in three volumes of two discs each, the 84 tracks of the anthology are recognized as having been a seminal inspiration for the folk music revival of the 1950s and 1960 (the 1997 reissue by the Smithsonian was embraced with critical acclaim and two Grammy awards).
[doesn’t the MTA have an umbrella?]
As the New York Times notes, yesterday’s episode was eerily similar to a subway tangle on August 26, 1999. I remember it well because I was leaving the city that day for California to attend my sister’s bat mitzvah. At that time, my commute was from Forest Hills, Queens, to DoubleClick’s offices near Madison Square. Hauling a suitcase and a garment bag with my suit in it, I spent two-and-a-half exhausting hours getting to work, including an ill-advised transfer and much walking around Court Square in Queens. When we finally crawled into Manhattan and just stopped, I climbed out of the subway to try for a bus, but they were all full, so I made the final stretch in a shared cab. And the whole time, I kept thinking how ridiculous it was to work this hard to get to Manhattan, when I’d be leaving at 2:30 to go back to Queens for my flight out of LaGuardia.
All of this raises the question: why hasn’t the MTA prepared for this sort of thing? It’s sort of worrying that a heavy downpour can paralyze New York. It’s going to happen again, guys. Can we maybe thing about how to improve things the next time?
Oh, and that picture you see in the Times of the flooded street is just a couple of blocks from my good friend’s new apartment, and also close to a giant Lowe’s store that is mysteriously full of Chassidic Jews late at night. If anyone can explain either the flooding of Smith and Ninth or why the spiritual descendents of the Baal Shem Tov shop nights at Lowe’s, let me know.
[west indian day parade]
Check out pictures of the day’s festivities. [via Gothamist]
[steam]
Powering the city, that’s what (or at least powering Manhattan up to 96th Street, which is why you never see the steam vents out in Brooklyn). Or as ConEd puts it:
Steam power from Con Edison is as much a part of Manhattan as subways and Times Square. The first steam generation plant began operating in 1882 – six months before the first electric service. Today, steam power has grown to play a major role in the life of the city. More than 100 miles of mains and service pipes make up the Con Edison steam system. The pipes deliver this clean, efficient energy source to about 2,000 customers from the Battery to 96th Street. In fact, the Con Edison system has become the largest steam district in the United States – larger than the next four U.S. systems combined as well as the largest steam district system in the world.
[the speech]
Probably the weirdest aspect of the speech was Bush’s pronunciation of “rather.” He used the word twice, each time pronouncing it “rohther” with a fine New England prep-school cadence that a young John Kerry might have adopted in his Kennedy-conscious youth. It seemed like a last trace of the elitist background that Dubya has tried to bury under an adopted Texas twang. Someone should tell him that real Texans don’t say “rohther.”
But they’ve gone home now, right? We can have our city back? And then maybe next January we can have our country back?
[the motorcade]
I suppose Clinton used to cause just as much of a mess, but at least we liked him. After a week of increasingly siege-like conditions, this wholesale shutdown of a major avenue, executed without prior warning, felt like a final insult.
When the president drives by, he doesn’t do it alone. After all of the marked and unmarked police cars and vans had pulled into place, the motorcade itself finally pulled into view, watched by helicopters hovering overhead. First came the contingent of motorcycle cops zooming in double file down either side of the avenue, which put into my mind the incongruous image of the Dykes on Bikes who always lead off the Gay Pride Parade. Then came more police cars, and finally a tight formation of two armored limos and a black SUV. And there he was, his waving hand and large head darkly visible through the blue-tinted glass of the limo on the left, furthest from me. It was the closest I have ever been to any president of the United States.
Having witnessed the driveby, I headed back over to the UN to get my lunch. In the plaza across the street from the Secretariat, about 25 people, mostly African but with a few white American supporters, held a demonstration demanding action in Darfur. The leader shouted phrases through a loudspeaker and the rest chanted after him, sounding weary: “Peace in Sudan! Justice in Sudan! Democracy in Sudan! Peace in Darfur! Freedom in Darfur!” No one paid much attention. Having nothing to say, nothing to add, I stood there dumbly until the light changed, then crossed the street and headed for the cafeteria.
As usual, the swirl of international voices and faces and costumes cheered me up immensely. At a table near mine, a man asked the fellow across from him, in heavily French-accented English, whether he was from a mission or an NGO; the second man ignored the question, staring off into the distance. The cafeteria was just redone — a new paint job, nicer chairs — and new blinds veiled the usual wide view of the East River. When they were suddenly raised mid-meal, several people applauded. There was Queens again, with the Pepsi-Cola sign and the Citicorp tower, as a tugboat slowly pushed a vast port-listing hulk of a ship toward the sea.
After I ate, I still had some time to kill (I have two-hour lunches), so I wandered across to the General Assembly Building and puttered around in the UN Bookstore. Toward the back is a computer where employees play MP3s of world music, and I stopped to listen to Caetano Veloso singing the Talking Heads’ “(Nothing But) Flowers”:
Once there were parking lots
Now it’s a peaceful oasis
This was a Pizza Hut
Now it’s all covered with daisies
I miss the honky tonks,
Dairy Queens, and 7-Elevens
I dream of cherry pies,
Candy bars, and chocolate chip cookies
We used to microwave
Now we just eat nuts and berries
This was a discount store,
Now it’s turned into a cornfieldDon’t leave me stranded here
I can’t get used to this lifestyle
[but does it have an awl?]
On my first trip to India, in 1996, I was startled by signs in banks banning weapons, but with an exception for “short knives for Sikhs.” (This was only one of the many things that startled me during that trip, and on balance was probably one of the least startling startling things, far less weird than, say, burning bodies bobbing in the Ganga or the monkey that leaped onto my dinner plate in Agra. But I digress.) There are those who argue that the kirpan is not a weapon, or at least is not intended as such, but I doubt they’ve convinced airlines and governments in these security-conscious times.
For more information on Sikh legal issues, including the wildly misguided discrimination they’ve faced in the US since 9/11, check out The Sikh Coalition, which includes a section of the USA Patriot Act specifically condemning anti-Sikh discrimination, as well as recommended guidelines for airport personnel dealing with Sikhs. (Should veiled women be required to show their faces to prove their identities? Yes, but a female security guard is preferable. Should Sikhs be permitted to wear the kirpan into the secure section of an airport? No, they should be required to place it in checked luggage.)
[animalistic politics]
What’s with the donkey and the elephant?
The Democratic Donkey began as an insult against populist Democrat Andrew Jackson, who was called a jackass. He decided to incorporate the symbol into his campaign, and later it came to represent his stubborn streak. But it was Harper’s Weekly cartoonist Thomas Nast, the famous opponent of Boss Tweed, who lodged the donkey symbol most firmly into the public imagination — probably with no prior knowledge of its earlier association with Jackson.
The Republican Elephant was also Thomas Nast’s creation. The story behind it is complicated, involving both accusations that President Grant was engaging in “Caesarism” and false reports of a mass breakout from the Central Park Zoo (you can’t make this stuff up, folks), and originally the elephant represented the Republican vote, as opposed to the party. But the image stuck.